Arbitration is back in the dock

About the Moroccan national team – written by / Badr El Din El Idrissi
Is there a team left, when we are barely finishing the seventh week of the professional championship, that did not invoke a statement or hint, publicly or by nodding, from arbitration errors, and a protest blog was drafted about it by express mail to the Royal Moroccan Football Federation and through it specifically to the Arbitration Directorate?
There is absolutely no way to cover the sun with a sieve or to work with the principle of “how many things have we fulfilled by leaving it or by neglecting it.” We are faced with cases that suffocate the national football scene with thick smoke, the source of which is a fire that has kindled somewhere, and it is necessary to quickly extinguish its flame, so as not to burn us all with its flame.
The protest, which differs in tone, wording and utterance from one team to another according to the degree of suffocation from the inferno of “arbitral errors”, is not only related to the influential decisions of the referees, whether they were referees in the court or the referees of the desert, but extends to the way in which matches are run by referees who taught a lesson in arbitration schools with their regional nerves Unified, he says, by adopting complete strictness in applying the law, even by frowning, to make the players obey and comply and not protest.
No one can deny the university that it was an initiative within its continent to address arbitration errors with many approaches, perhaps the most important of which is to hurry to seek the help of technology, as the university was one of the first continental federations to spend a large sum of money in order to work with VAR technology and qualify the referees to deal with complete impartiality with This modern technology, which is intended to lift grievances, reduce the discretionary powers of referees, and spread a kind of justice in matches, although the stadiums with technical equipment have not yet been completed.
We were very happy, with the advent of this kindness, which preserves rights and unintentionally reduces the areas of error, and increased our certainty of the existence of this intention to improve the performance of the rulers of our right to aches, accusations and protests, that the Arbitration Directorate completely opened up to its sports surroundings, by organizing weekly visual analogies, dealing with It contains the strong decisions made by the referees during the matches, and as it provides these decisions with a legal basis that removes confusion and helps educate players, coaches and even club presidents, it does not hesitate to defame the mistakes of referees when they apply modern technologies.
And in view of the unacceptable manifestations we see in our matches of protesting decisions taken by the referees and waiting for a definitive opinion from the room of the mouse, and the protests made by some clubs formulated in the language of flotation, despite that we do not claim that our referees do not make mistakes, not in calculating goals or not, nor In announcing the penalty kicks or not, as long as the errors resulting from decisions that the mouse cannot reach because they do not fall within the scope of his powers, the source of these referees’ personality and leadership spirit, and these are things related mainly to the formative aspects of the referees, and just as we cannot give football Al-Wataniya copied many skilled and legendary players, such as Larbi Benmbarek, Hassan Aksabi, Abderrahmane Belmahjoub, Ahmed Fares and Mohamed Timoumi until Noureddine Naybet, it is very difficult to get a judgment on the splendor and legend of the late Said Belgoula, nor the great referees who passed on Moroccan football They ruled matches that were taking place on a frightening scale.
The encirclement of the arbitration crisis, which I do not imagine is as gloomy as it seems to some, passes from inviting presidents, coaches, club deans and media men, to a national debate in which everyone sits at the dialogue table, and the discussion takes place calm and responsible among all those involved. The referees change the transactional and behavioral approach in managing matches and strictly adhere to the provisions of the VAR protocol, the coaches and players to completely abandon the exaggerated and useless protests, and the club presidents so that they do not sprinkle salt on the wound by issuing floating reports whose aim is only to provoke, and the media to stand up to what is happening Pause a neutral critic familiar with the law and its provisions.
We consider it a crisis of arbitration, not from the perspective of the mistakes committed, but from the perspective of trust that has become almost lost between referees and clubs, and this is a dangerous matter that cannot be tolerated.